A very good Friday

Wyoming? I often get asked why in the world did you move from Florida to Wyoming?

The reason is pretty obvious when you take a look at my last Friday. I started the morning with the drive to take sunrise photographs in the Grand Teton National Park about 15 minutes north of my home in Jackson.  After a few shots I decided to return to Jackson and have breakfast at my favorite restaurant. On the way back to town I noticed the the elk herd at the National Elk Reserve had started to migrate north toward their summer home in Yellowstone National Park.  About 100-200 elk had crossed the Gros Ventre river and many of the 5,000+ elk remaining in the reserve were headed towards the river. I sped home grabbed some more gear and had a quick breakfast at Bubba's.

After breakfast, we decided to return to the Kelly road to observe the migration of Elk crossing the Gros Ventre. I grabbed my 7D and a 100-400 mm zoom and walked a quarter mile across hard pack snow into the woods. I hadn't walked 100 yards in the trees when I practically ran into four moose. Three of these were very close in the trees and occupied about 45 minutes of shooting time. I kept walking through hard packed snow to the Gros Ventre.  Here I was treated to a spectacle unlike any other. About 100-200 elk had already crossed the river and were grazing in the tree line. The snow was completely covered with elk tracks and other signs of the moving herd.  I turned to the West and walked along the river looking for the massive herd to follow.  During my walk I was greeted by three bald eagles swooping down the river looking for fish. At the first bend in the river a flock of Canada Geese were chattering noisily along the rocky bank. This deserved another couple dozen photos.

I continued along the river and to my amazement on the high banks on the South side there were literally hundreds if not a couple thousand elk who had moved from the refuge to the high bluffs of the river. I remained there for about an hour watching the elk but they had laid down and it was clear they would not be moving in the next couple of hours. As I walked along the river I estimated that there were elk for about 2 miles positioned nearly nose-to-tail along the entire ridge line.

On the way back to my Jeep I stopped again the photograph a cow and two moose yearlings.  They posed majestically in a cranny between two trees, seemingly unbothered by my presence.  I continued my walk through the woods and was startled by another cow elk as she ran across my path.  Over the two hours of my trek, the warm sun had softened the crust on the top of the snow making the walk across the meadow "interesting." I consistently broke through between six and 12 inches of snow as I crossed the meadow to the steeply inclined gravelly bank back up to the parking area on Gros Vente Road.

Before returning to Jackson, I drove down the road past the small town of Kelly seeing three more bald eagles and several more moose bringing the total moose for the day up to 19.

Why do I like Wyoming? This was just another spring morning and a very good Friday.

Useful filters for nature photography

In the last posting we wrapped up the discussion about lens selection and ended with some comments about filters that are used with your lenses to create special effects or solve difficult lighting problems. We will pick up on that topic in this posting.

In the ancient days of 35mm film, many filters were considered to be essential for good photography. In the pre-digital age tinted filters were needed to adjust color temperature for different films but today these adjustments can be made easily in post-processing software so it is rare to need color adjustment (often called warming or cooling) filters.

UV / haze filters are often sold to buyers of new cameras and lenses to protect the front of the lens from physical damage. These filters are said to help clear haze from the sky on landscape shots but really have no appreciable benefit over adjustments to the image that can be made in post production software. Low quality filters can degrade image quality and induce flare from back lit subjects and should never be used with high quality lenses. High quality filters may not harm the image quality but may add $100 to the cost of each lens and while they keep dust and water off the front lens, their ability to protect from physical damage is questionable. I use them on some of my lenses but am not sure that the $500 cost was worth the price. I personally believe that a lens hood is better protection and will not degrade your images.

A circular polarizing filter (sometimes called lens or CPL) is probably the most important filter for outdoor photographers.  The polarizing filter will cut through haze, reduce reflections from water or shiny objects, saturate the sky, and enhance clouds better than any post-processing software and produces just about the only image changes that cannot be achieved in software. The CPL is actually two filters mounted together in a rotating ring that can be turned for the desired effect. The CPL works by aligning light waves and thus reducing glare. The filter has its greatest effect when it is 90 degrees to the light source so it must be rotated to the proper position before the image is captured. The filter should be used in almost all landscape photography and shots of still waters. The CPL has two side-effects. First, it reduces exposure by about two stops meaning that aperture or ISO will need to be increased or a larger f-stop will be needed compared to a shot without the filter. Next, the filter can cause some saturation abnormalities when used with wide-angle lenses. Because the filter is most effective when turned 90 degrees to the light, a wide-angle lens may 'see' variations in saturation of the sky.  High quality CPLs are quite expensive and should be sized for your largest diameter lens. Adapters are available to match the CPL with lenses of smaller diameter. High quality CPLs are very thin and do not induce vignetting at the corners of you shots as may occur with cheaper, thicker filters. High quality CPLs are coated to reduce lens flare.

Sometimes, nature photographers need to reduce the amount of light reaching the sensor to achieve a proper exposure in bright daylight. A classic effect is to use a very long exposure 1/2 to 4 seconds to create a dreamy smoothness to a waterfall or other moving water. When the ISO is reduced to the minimal sensitivity and the aperture is reduced to the smallest opening, sometimes in bright daylight, the slowest shutter speed to properly expose the image is 1/60 - 1/100 second - too fast to get the desired effect of smoothing the water. Here is where the neutral density filter comes to play. A neutral density filter is a neutral gray filter that reduces light to the lens without altering the tint or hue of the light. The filters are rated by the number of stops (halving) of the light caused by the filter. Typically a 2-4 stop filter will allow the light reduction that is needed for the exposure time you want to use but sometimes the light needs to be reduced by 6-8 stops. Neutral density filters can be stacked to achieve an additive effect on exposure reduction. Stacking more than two filter may cause vignetting of the corners of the image. Another solution is a variable neutral density filter that can be adjusted from 2 to 9 stops of light reduction. These seem to work well as a cost-effective alternative to having multiple fixed neutral density filters. A third solution is a rectangular external gel or glass filter added to the end of your lens. Multiple filters can be stacked in the holder to achieve the desired effect.

Another very useful filter for the landscape photographer is a graduated neutral density filter.  These filters are usually rectangular glass or resin mounted in a holder on the end of the lens. The filter is graduated in that the bottom is clear (usually) and the top is progressively more dense. The purpose of the GND filter is to reduce light from a bright sky while maintaining the light in the foreground. The filter is simply moved up or down after the shot is composed so the light reduction occurs above the horizon in the bright sky. These filters tend to be pricey and are available with soft or hard edges meaning the darkening occurs abruptly or gradually. I prefer the hard edge set on the horizon.  They are also available in a 'reversed' form for certain shots with a bright foreground and may be stacked to achieve the desired effect. GND filters are rated at values of 0.3 (1 stop), 0.6 (two stops), and 0.9 (three stops) of light reduction. The two stop reduction is most useful but at times needs to be stacked with a second 1 stop filter. They may also be stacked with a polarizing filter or plain solid, neutral density filter. The glass filters are easily broken and the resin (plastic) filters are easily scratched so while very useful, GND filters can quickly become very expensive.  The screw-on circular GNDs should never be used. Although cheaper than the rectangular filters, they drastically limit your ability to properly compose your shots since the graduation is at a fixed point on the lens. 

 The list of specialty filters goes on and on. These filters can be used to help tone black and white images, induce color (hue) shifts, achieve white balance, or produce unusual light effects such as star or other shape effects at points of light. None are necessary to the nature photographer but they can produce interesting a visually unusual effects.

So by all means obtain CPL and ND filters as you will definitely find a need for them. As for the others, experiment with their use and when you have some more money to blow on photography gear, why not?

So what lens is right for me?

In the last posting, I discussed the various general types of lenses - normal, wide-angle, and telephoto - and the pros and cons of fixed (prime) lenses and zoom lenses. Now, I would like to get more specific about the selection of focal length and add some specialty lenses and lens accessories to the mix.

The focal length of a lens is the distance from the optical center of focus within the lens to the plane of the image sensor in the camera. Focal length is usually measured in millimeters (mm) and the longer the focal length the greater the size of the image on the sensor (sometimes referred to as magnification.) I mentioned that a lens with the field of view of our eyes in approximately 50mm when projected on a full-frame (24x36mm) sensor. However, most cameras use a sensor smaller than full-frame that is called a crop sensor. The camera is designed so that the crop sensor still 'sees' the full image so, effectively, the image is magnified by the crop factor of the camera. Typically, point and shoot cameras have a very large crop factor (from 2 to almost 6) so that the effective focal length of the lens is much greater than the measured focal length (compared to full-frame sensor.) This is why many point and shoot cameras are referred to as 'super-zoom' cameras and their zoom range is defined as the magnification beyond the shortest focal length of the lens (12x, 15x, 20x and even 30x.) Digital SLR cameras do not use this 'magnification' terminology but rather relate the effective focal length to that of a full-frame sensor.

So how does crop factor influence the effective focal length of the lens. Many dSLRs from Nikon, Sony, Samsung, and Pentax have a crop factor of 1.5 while most Canon dSLRs have a crop factor of 1.6. The crop factor is multiplied times the actual focal length to obtain the effective focal length seen on the sensor.  In other words a normal 50mm lens on a Canon 1.6 crop sensor looks like an 80mm lens. So this 'normal' lens is working like a short telephoto (if you were shooting on a full-frame camera.) This effect has a tremendous advantage for a wildlife photographer who always wants a longer lens to create images closer to the subject. Effectively, a 200mm (medium telephoto) functions like a 320mm lens on a Canon crop sensor camera. A 70-200mm zoom functions like a 112-320mm zoom. This sounds like a real bonus but what if you are shooting landscapes with a wide-angle lens? Now your 24mm (medium wide-angle) lens acts like a 38.4mm (barely wider than normal) lens. This is part of the reason that landscape photographers like full-frame cameras - they can maximize their wide-angle ability.

So when purchasing a new lens you must carefully consider the type of photography you will be doing and the crop factor of your camera to select a lens that will give you the effect you desire.

There are also several types of specialty lenses that appeal to nature photographers. The first is a macro lens. A macro lens is specially designed for a very close focusing distance for its focal length. A true macro lens projects an image of the subject at its full size on the camera sensor - a 1:1 image. Macro lenses come in different focal lengths depending upon how close to the subject you can get. Typically, macros range from 60mm to about 200mm. These lenses are designed for ultra-sharp images captured at very close distances and are often used to shoot flowers, insects, and other small critters. Focusing a macro lens is a challenge because the the very narrow depth-of-field - often only a millimeter or two when wide open (f/2.8.)  Depth of field is improved if the lens can be stopped down (f/11- f/32) but this usually means a very long shutter speed or supplemental light using a reflector or flash. Some general lenses have a close-focusing feature they refer to a a macro function. I have used this to advantage on my small Sony camera but it is not a true macro because you cannot focus down to a 1:1 size - mine is more like a 1:2 but it still focuses down to about 3-4 inches from the subject.

Another lens sometimes used by landscape photographers is a fish-eye lens. A fish-eye is an extreme wide-angle lens (6-10mm focal length) that is able to capture nearly a 180 degree view. These lenses cause extreme distortion of the image resulting in curving horizons than are usually interesting and can be very pleasing to view.

With all of the choices of lenses, what is the best general 'carry-around' lens for everyday photography? This is a very difficult question to answer and most photographers will tell you that a 24-70mm zoom is a good all around lens (best on a full-frame camera.) This lens gives you a mild wide-angle to short telephoto perspective and can be fast (f/2.8) and not unwieldly large. I like this lens a lot when I am in town shooting what-ever comes by, but it is not my favorite lens in the wilds. It is generally too short for birds and animals and not wide enough on my crop-sensor camera for great landscapes. It is fast for dawn and dusk shots but I almost always carry 25-30 pounds of other lenses and gear when I hike to take wildlife or scenic shots. Some people like super-zoom lenses (28-300mm) for general work. Often these lenses are slow (f/5.6 or worse) and some lack high quality optics so I have avoided the super-zooms.

Finally, how does one properly accessorize your lens? A lens case is a good thing to keep in the closet at home or to store your lens when you are not shooting, but I never use lens cases in the field because they add unnecessary volume to the gear and it takes too much time to get the lens out of the case. I keep my lenses in my pack with lens covers on front and back to protect from dust and weather. 

There is controversy among photographers about using a UV/haze filter to protect the front of your active lens. Clearly, low quality glass in front of your expensive lens can degrade image quality and introduce lens flare on back-lit images so these should be avoided. I have chosen to use high-quality neutral (UV/haze) filters on the front of most of my lenses. It is a high cost but does keep dust off the much higher cost lens. I have never dropped or scratched a lens so I can't (yet) vouch for the protective effect of the neutral filter. Many (maybe most) professionals advise against a neutral filter over the lens. They doubt the protective effect if the lens is dropped and worry about the negative effect on image quality. Almost all professionals use a lens hood on all lenses. The hood protects the front of the lens from damage, reduces the likelihood of lens flare on back lit images, and has no negative effect on image quality. I always use a lens hood unless I need to rotate a polarizing filter or variable neutral density filter or am using a rectangular graduated neutral density filter.  These filters will be discussed in the next posting.